However, motion handling is much better on the Samsung because it has a quicker response time, and it also gets brighter and has better reflection handling if you want to use it in a bright environment. The VG27AQ has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles and it gets a bit brighter in HDR. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their VG27AQ doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. This is much better than similar displays with lower native resolutions, like the MSI Optix G273. The ASUS has a much higher refresh rate, much better motion handling, and supports FreeSync. Certified as NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible, delivering a seamless, tear-free gaming experience by enabling VRR (variable refresh rate) by default. But then if you switch to playing Metro Exodus and performance is fluctuating between 120 and 100 Hz, overdrive 80 is going to deliver inverse ghosting at that refresh rate. In typical Asus fashion there are six overdrive modes available under the "Trace Free" setting, which doesn't have a great name if I'm honest, and it's hidden on the second page of one of the monitor's settings panels. tried for several minutes. Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ - OSD and setup The Asus panel has decent build quality and good adjustment options. The big question for the TUF Gaming VG27AQ is how well positioned it is among 1440p high-refresh IPS displays. This monitor will run better the closer to max refresh that you are. A grey to grey average of 5.35ms is good for an IPS, dark level performance is improved and refresh rate compliance is up to 77%, so ghosting and smearing isn't as prominent. You can easily share your work with a colleague thanks to the excellent ergonomics and the wide viewing angles ensure everyone viewing enjoys the same accurate image. The Samsung has a 32:9 aspect ratio, which is twice the size of the ASUS. The range of height adjustment is above average and it's great to get enough pivot support to use the monitor in a portrait orientation. It also has a quicker response time and built-in speakers. This is a great new technology that in my eyes actually makes backlight strobing worth using, as you can use it alongside adaptive sync. Performance is similar to the VG27AQ, but it has the benefit of better 60Hz experience, and better factory calibration for around $80 less. G-SYNC Compatible technology delivers the smoothest, fastest and most breathtaking gaming visuals by eliminating screen tearing and choppy frame rates, and minimizing display stutter and input lag. It's a good choice if you often share your screen either for work or for a co-op gaming session. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is much better than the Acer Nitro RG241Y Pbiipx. However, neither of the two monitors can display deep blacks in a dark room due to their IPS panels. 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out 2 x HDMI 2.0 1 x DisplayPort 1.2: Audio . The performance of this mode is only okay with moderate strobe crosstalk, but this feature is simply something you don't get with any other monitor. Passable black uniformity for a monitor, and it's much better than the PG279QZ and VG279Q, but this could vary from unit to unit. ago Physically, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a little better thanthe LG 27GN800-B. Finally, the monitor's excellent ergonomics make it easy to position it comfortably on your desk. Over HDMI, the VRR range at 1440p can go up to 144Hz. It has native Adaptive Sync and FreeSync support, and it's certified as G-SYNC compatible. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the Dell Alienware AW3420DW. The TUF is better for gaming thanks to its high refresh rate and fast response time, although the ProArt actually has a faster response time at 60Hz. This isn't a monitor that's good for 60 Hz gaming, response times are slow with overdrive disabled and if you've set the monitor to overdrive 80, which is optimal for 165Hz then start playing at 60 Hz, inverse ghosting is very obvious. Those are some serious specs, but not even the most exciting thing the VG27AQ has in store.For the first time in any gaming monitor, Motion Blur Reduction and Adaptive-sync can be enabled at the same time. On the other hand, the AOChas much better contrast, so blacks look black in a dark room instead of gray. The ASUS has a much better build quality, significantly better ergonomics, and it has a black frame insertion feature that can help reduce the appearance of motion blur. to get trip updates and message other travellers. Why are the lines in Flipaclip so low quality? It's suitable for most rooms, but might not be able to fight glare in a very bright room. When looking at other gaming monitors, this sort of default color performance is pretty standard although ideally we'd want those deltaEs below 2.0 out of the box. If that bothers you, the '60' setting performs very similarly, with a bit less overshoot. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a better monitor than the Dell S3220DGF for most uses. is there any way to My motherboard is fucked, can it be replaced if its Why did ASUS remove "Release Date" info of drivers how do iIplace it there? It favors multitasking and allows you to see more details of your gaming arena. Provides a greater brightness range and introduces more contrast gradations. The ASUS is better built and has better ergonomics. Informatique . Welcome! We will respond to you within 24 hours and do our best to help you out! TheMSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are two excellent gaming monitors; they each have a 1440p resolution and a 165Hz refresh rate. . That's because now, the rate at which the backlight is strobed can be synced to the varying refresh rate of the monitor, that's the major breakthrough Asus has made. But it's a tad more expensive at $500. ASUS originally announced this model with a 155Hz overclock, but it was released with 155Hz, 160Hz, and 165Hz options. The ASUS VG27AQ is an excellent gaming monitor and outperforms many other 27 inch, 1440p VA monitors we've tested. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A andthe ASUS TUF VG27AQ perform very similarly. The performance or any side effect after activation is not guaranteed. Contrast is a bit better than I expected at around 1200:1, very good from an IPS monitor, with decent black levels. Switching the overdrive mode down to 60 or even 40 makes more sense for this game, but this is an annoying manual adjustment. So these are basically your choices, between the standard blur you get on an IPS LCD with about 5-7ms response times, or artifacts with backlight strobing. And yes, this is a 165 Hz monitor. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a significantly better monitor than the AOC CQ27G1. The Color submenu includes Brightness, Contrast, and Color Temperature, with Warm, Normal, Cool and User options for the latter. While that summary doesn't sound all that promising, it does have an ace up its sleeve in ELMB-Sync. Their difference in overall performance is mainly due to the HDR support that the TUF provides and due to its faster refresh rate that helps motion look smoother. If you are planning to use this at 165Hz without variable refresh, the panel is capable of fast response times which in the 5ms range is very good from an IPS. The ASUS has a bigger screen, a higher resolution, and significantly better ergonomics. *Selective graphics cards/GPUs can support 165Hz graphics source output (DP port). The Gigabyte has better response times at max refresh rate and 60Hz. The input lag is remarkably low and the high resolution and screen real estate allow you to see more details of your gaming arena. The Lenovo has faster response time, better gradient handling, and significantly better color accuracy out of the box. If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing. The TUF supports HDR and has a faster refresh rate that improves the appearance of motion. However, the VG259QM has a higher refresh rate and faster response time. It has decent reflection handling and wide viewing angles so you can enjoy a movie with a friend in a room that has a few lights without issue. We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. $200.00 + $80.00 shipping. However, the Gigabyte is better for well-lit rooms because it gets brighter and has better reflection handling. However, the Dell has a significantly better motion handling, peak brightness, and reflection handling. Unlike most monitors, this feature is available at the same time as FreeSync. Occasion (VG27AQ ) sur LDLC, n1 du high-tech. In terms of gaming, both monitors are similar. The ASUS uses an IPS panel, which results in better viewing angles, but worse contrast. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. The XG279Q has a slightly higher max refresh rate, it gets brighter, displays a wide color gamut for HDR, and has a quicker response time. Site Navigation Welcome Home Account . It has a square-shaped base with some red on it. Saturation deltaE performance is average at 3.62, we don't get oversaturation here because this is just an sRGB panel with no wide gamut capabilities, but with that green tint, performance isn't perfect. The TUF supports FreeSync variable refresh rate (VRR) technology, while the ROG supports G-SYNC VRR. It also has a much quicker response time at its max refresh rate, it has lower input lag and much better ergonomics. The TUF Gaming VG27AQ has decent out-of-the-box color accuracy. This new technology is called ASUS Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync (ELMB SYNC). The VG27AQ has an excellent resolution and provides you with a great amount of screen real estate. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is slightly better than the ASUS TUF VG27AQ. Gaming-wise, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ performs better than the Samsung Odyssey G5 LC27G55T because it has a slightly higher refresh rate and faster response time to deliver a clearer image with less smearing behind fast-moving objects. The ASUS has a higher 165Hz refresh rate with a faster response time at 60Hz to makemotion looksmoother. It's also wide gamut. TUF Gaming VG27AQ Overview Tech Specs Review Support Where to buy Notify me $309.00 Display Panel Size (inch) : 27 Aspect Ratio : 16:9 Display Viewing Area (H x V) : 596.74 x 335.66 mm Display Surface : Non-Glare Backlight Type : LED Panel Type : IPS Viewing Angle (CR10, H/V) : 178/ 178 Pixel Pitch : 0.233mm Resolution : 2560x1440 So with ELMB-Sync, we don't need to throw away a smooth variable refresh experience when we turn on the blur-reducing ELMB mode. 2002 - 2022 Vijandren Ramadass. Response time performance is a bit more complicated than this though, because the level of overshoot and the speed of transitions is heavily influenced by the refresh rate. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T are both excellent gaming monitors; however, they're also very different. Since the color temperature is warmer than the target, the image has a slight red-yellowish tint. Excellent ASUS VG27AQ TUF Gaming 27" 165hz 2560x1440 HDR LCD GamingMonitor GSync . A few tweaks to on-screen settings can improve performance, correcting the green tint my unit had. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QZ. The ASUS has a faster refresh rate that makes motion look smoother, and better ergonomics to help you place it comfortably on your desk. Ideal settings for viewing photos and graphics online. The TUF Gaming VG27AQ has an excellent native refresh rate and can be easily overclocked to 165Hz. Asus TUF VG27AQ 27" WQHD LED Gaming LCD Monitor, 16:9, 2560 x 1440, 165 Hz, 1 ms. $352.27 + $65.23 shipping. The gamma doesn't follow the target curve closely and as a result, most scenes are darker. They both have IPS panels with wide viewing angles, but the contrast ratio is much better on the ASUS. That's the theory anyway. However, the VG27AQ has better ergonomics, better out-of-the-box accuracy, and its BFI feature worksover a wider frequency range. On Windows 10, click on Windows HD Color Settings first, then enable Use HDR. At 120Hz, an overdrive setting of 60 delivers better performance, overshoot is still a bit high, but with a grey to grey average of 6ms it's not too bad. It has a great resolution and size that favors multitasking. Locate the HDR settings and ensure it's enabled. This is our recommended mode at the maximum refresh. Finally, the ASUS delivers more uniform blacks, although neither of the two monitors can display deep blacks in a dark room due to their IPS panels. On the other hand, the ViewSonic supports G-SYNC andhas a quicker response time, which is much better at 60Hz than the ASUS, a better SDR color gamut, and it has better reflection handling. Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available. The TUF has better reflection handling, which is great for a room with a few more lights, and can also display more uniform blacks in a dark room. Response time performance is mixed, decent at high fixed refresh rates but to get a good experience using variable refresh, it's a bit fiddly. The VG27AQ has an optional backlight strobing feature to improve the appearance of motion, but it still doesn't look as good as the PG279QM. They each have a BFI feature, but the one on the ASUS can be used with VRR enabled, which can't be done on the MSI. Out of the box calibration is average on the TUF Gaming VG27AQ, which is not unusual for a gaming monitor. Normally we briefly skip over backlight strobing, but it's a central feature of this monitor. Extensive connectivity options, including, I/O: DisplayPort1.2, HDMI (v2.0) support a wide array of multimedia devices. This monitor works great with MacBooks. And if your frame rate is jumping around more than that, there could be a case where no overdrive mode is delivering an optimal experience. The Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ is a good monitor, with some really excellent features and some other middling stuff. Its out-of-box color accuracy is also better than the TUF VG27AQ. The Acer also supports a wide color gamut, which the ASUS doesn't, and it gets brighter in HDR. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. The VG27AQ puts up excellent input lag numbers, at below 0.5ms of processing delay, and an overall lag from input to finished transition of under 10ms, which is elite. The default 60 mode is decent but not fantastic, with an average grey to grey response of 6.82ms and unusually for an IPS panel, a hint of dark level smearing. However, If you use the monitor for work, the LG is better for text clarity. On the other hand, the TUF supports HDR. Ports are standard stuff. Although both monitors have excellent ergonomics, the LG's stand takes up less space. Where it gets interesting is with the upper three modes. Enhances contrast and color saturation for lively, vivid visuals ideal for viewing movies. Add . The third reason, and this is crucial to the overall picture its price tag. We're excited to see where ELMB-Sync goes from here on future Asus monitors, particularly higher-end options if they can nail down performance overall. It has the clearest motion out of all the settings, but there's overshoot in some brighter transitions. On the other hand, the Dell has much better reflection handling and faster response time, resulting in clearer motion. The downside to the ViewSonic monitor is the its inferior design and no height adjustability. On Windows 11, toggle ON Use HDR. Answer 1 of 5: Please help - So I thought Eurostar starts selling tickets many months in advance (so I've got my inbound ticket for the 16th of Sept), but now the whole week of 24th-28th is greyed out when I want to book one way back to London? 14,000.00 Read more; When disabling ELMB, you may experience ghosting. At the very least there might be two suitable modes, one for high refresh and one for 60 Hz gaming, which you could choose between depending on whether you're using the monitor with a high or low refresh input. The ASUSTUF VG27AQ is slightly better than the Acer Nitro XV273Xbmiiprzx in mixed usage. The Samsung performs better gaming-wise because it has a higher refresh rate and faster response times. Also, the LG can display a wide color gamut for HDR, whereas the ASUS can't. However, the VG27AQ has lower input lag, the BFI feature can flickerat a lower frequency, and it has much better ergonomics. ELMB SYNC works with G-SYNC Compatible, allowing gamers to enjoy sharp, high speed frames. It's recommended to turn on ClearType (top photo), as it significantly improves the appearance of diagonal lines, as seen on the R and N. The VG27AQ's gradient handling is excellent. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is much better than the Samsung CHG70. 2022 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The ASUS' refresh rate is faster, which helps motion look smoother. . That said, they're both versatile and perform well overall. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ and the ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHPE are very different monitors, each with strengths and weaknesses. The problem then becomes response times, which increase to a slow 11.17ms. We'll also show how the monitor looks at 165Hz with overdrive level 80 without ELMB enabled. Yes, we reach a 3.44ms grey to grey average, but high levels of overshoot hurt performance, so we wouldn't recommend this mode. The VG279QM is a lot brighter, especially in HDR. Enhances the color of your opponents' health/mana bars, so that you can simultaneously respond and be the first to destroy the opposing team's main. At an overdrive level of 100, things get out of control. Thanks so much for that, I enabled it in settings and now its popping up, as for overclocking someone else said I need to use DisplayPort rather than HDMI so my problems are solved , Which is dumb cause when its enabled at the OS level it looks awful, Ive downloaded the latest drivers but Im not 1000% sure if theyre correctly installed, Im looking in device manager and the only thing I can see under monitors is generic PnP monitor so I dont think thats it. HDR wont work with ELMB. The ASUS supports HDR10, which the MSI doesn't, and it has significantly better ergonomics, allowing you to place the screen in an ideal position. But if adaptive sync is enabled and maybe a game's frame rate is fluctuating, or you're playing different games with different levels of performance, you could be seeing overshoot artifacts if you set and forget an overdrive mode. It also makes moving objects appear even sharper, so gameplay is more fluid and responsive. The ASUS is also way better for gaming, as it has a much faster response time, and it supports 4k downscaling, which is great for PS5 and Xbox Series X gamers. May need to do a restart to get your monitor recognized. The best Overdrive setting is '0' as there's no overshoot and there's no visible ghosting with fast-moving objects like the other settings. But the VG27AQ has three or four optimal modes throughout the refresh range, which is annoying and unfortunate for adaptive sync gamers. Comparaison entre Philips 27M1N5500ZA vs Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ. The stand supports the monitor well and prevents most wobble. ASUS ROG 27" HDR Gaming Monitor 1440P WQHD Fast IPS 170Hz 1ms Eye Care. But when you are offering these specs at below $500, it seems like everyone wanting to buy a monitor is taking notice. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the BenQ EX2780Q inmost uses. Fast-moving content has only minimal blur trail and the excellent refresh rate ensures smooth motion. 2560 x 1440 pixels - 1 ms - Format 16/9 - Dalle IPS - 165 Hz - HDR - Compatible G-Sync / FreeSync - HDMI/DisplayPort - Noir - Article utilis. However, the ASUS has a Black Frame Insertion feature that works simultaneously with VRR to improve motion clarity. The edges are a bit darker, but it's not noticeable with most content. Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO 8GB (1X8GB) DDR4 3200MHZ C16 Memory Rs. Almost all the exposed surfaces are plastic of some kind, no metal stands or anything like that, and a lot of it is just your standard basic black plastic. It supports a black frame insertion (BFI) feature that helps improve the overall appearance of motion and can also deliver more uniform blacks. I just received my RX 5700 XT and Asus XG32VQR today. Add to cart. It supports AMD's FreeSync variable refresh rate technology and is also NVIDIA certified, for a nearly tear-free gaming experience. Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board. At 450, the Asus VG27AQ is pretty competitively priced considering its key specs (and its manufacturer). The ASUS has better ergonomics and a Black Frame Insertion feature. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the Acer Nitro VG271UP Pbmiipx. It remains low even at 60Hz, which is important for console gamers. It also supports FreeSync variable refresh rate technology to reduce screen tearing. It's fine at a fixed refresh like 165Hz, but not ideal if you're making use of variable refresh. But it gets worse because at 60Hz, say you're gaming at ultra quality settings in a graphically intensive game, or you've hooked the monitor up to a console, overshoot is significant at most of the overdrive settings. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is an excellent monitor for gaming. The Acer is a 4k monitor with native G-SYNC support, while the ASUS hasa 1440p resolution and has native FreeSync support. If you want a 1440p high-refresh IPS gaming monitor on a budget - and it seems a lot of people do - we think many people would be better off with the ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHD. Unfortunately, its black uniformity is quite poor. Comparacin entre Philips 27M1N5500ZA vs Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ. However, the ViewSonic has much better reflection handling and significantly better black uniformity. The TUF Gaming VG27AQ monitor has decent reflection handling. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is slightly better than the Gigabyte AORUSFI27Q. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a bit better than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q. The monitor displays rich, saturated colors in most luminosities. No cloudiness or patchiness, this is a very uniform display that is just as good as the best IPS monitors we've tested. ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ 27" 170Hz IPS LED WQHD Gaming Monitor - Black. *Selective graphics cards/GPUs can support 165Hz graphics source output (DP port). Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ 27in WQHD 165Hz IPS Gaming LED LCD w/ HAS, Speakers in Clearance at our Calgary North East Memory Express location. Informations Gnrales; Numro de Modle: Philips 27M1N5500ZA: Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ . It gets brighter and has wider viewing angles. The next factor is it includes a feature called ELMB-Sync, which for the first time allows you to use adaptive sync variable refresh rates and blur-reducing backlight strobing at the same time. Where the VG27AQ falls away is in the following charts. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. We do improve performance a fair bit with these tweaks, but deltaE averages remain between 2 and 3, not quite what we're looking for. For $430, this is a very competitive offering in today's market, especially for the 165Hz refresh rate and feature set. But it works, and the build quality overall is pretty good. The VG27AQ actually does support HDR10 inputs for some reason, not that the experience is any good because it doesn't support any key features of HDR. The ASUShas an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, but the Dell's VA panel offers a much better contrast ratio, and it can also get brighter to fight glare in bright rooms. The ASUS has better vertical viewing angles, and the unit we tested has better black uniformity, but this varies. ASUS Shadow Boost technology clarifies dark areas of the game without overexposing brighter areas, improving overall viewing while also making it easier to spot enemies hidden in dark areas of the map. It feels better built and has a much better, more adjustable stand. Rethinking auto manufacturing: Poised for disruption? Asus TUF Gaming VG289Q (HDR Black) at Amazon for $289 Grayscale, EOTF and Color Image 1 of 2 (Image credit: Tom's Hardware) (Image credit: Tom's Hardware) The VG289Q's color and grayscale. The XG27AQalso has a much wider color gamut in both SDR and HDR, and it has wider viewing angles, although the VG27AQ has better ergonomics and gets a little brighter to combat glare, so it may be better suited to an office environment. 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out 2 x HDMI 2.0 1 x DisplayPort 1.2: 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out 1 x HDMI 1.4 1 x D-sub: Audio; Audio Speakers: 2 x 2W: Features; Cool Features: ELMB (Extreme Low Motion Blur) Flicker-free technology Trace Free Technology GamePlus (Crosshair/Timer/FPS Counter/Display Alignment/Sniper) HDCP (High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection . Its native 144Hz refresh rate can be overclocked to 170Hz, and it has a great response time at its max refresh rate. HDR works with adaptive sync on this monitor. The best Overdrive setting, which is called 'Trace Free', is '80'. Image & son . Since this is different than the setting at its max refresh rate, you might have to change it when playing games at 60Hz. Out of stock. TechSpot is supported by its audience. It also supports HDR and has a lower input lag, but the Dell has better color accuracy, reflection handling, and a slightly higher peak brightness. When it works, it works really well to improve clarity for gaming. We will respond to you within 24 hours and do our best to help you out! Without comparing this performance to any other monitors just yet, we already have a mixed bag. Press Win + I, and navigate to System > Display. The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are very similar overall. The ASUS supports HDR, but this doesn't add much, unfortunately. When the laptop is on battery, everything works well But My ASUS TUF 3080 is making a loud buzzing noise under My backlighting bleed is getting out of hand any way Press J to jump to the feed. They're both 1440p monitors with a native 144Hz refresh rate, but the ASUS can be overclocked to 165Hz. The ASUS has much better ergonomics, so it might be easier to find an ideal viewing position. HDR: HDR10: 3D: No: No: Tamao, Peso, Color; Profundidad de la Caja: 1.69 in 4.3 cm 43 mm 0.14 ft: 2.6 in . Some of their high-end ROG products may seem a little overpriced considering there's so much competition. Description Reviews (0) Description. Not as bad as a VA panel, but a 10ms dark level average is mediocre for this technology. . The ASUS VG279QM is slightly better than the ASUS TUF VG27AQ for gaming. Crosshairs, timers, FPS counters, shadow boosting and blue light filters are some of the major inclusions, plus of course ELMB-Sync for backlight strobing. If the timing isn't correct, strobing the backlight introduces artifacts. If you want a 1440p monitor with a quicker response time, then look into the MSI Optix G273QF. It has four levels, plus off. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the Razer Raptor 27 144Hz. Because over clocking is only available with DisplayPort. Though the Asus has a maximum refresh rate of 165Hz, it has a higher resolution, providing better picture quality, and is a better choice for multitasking. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ and theSamsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 are both excellent for gaming, but they have different features. If you want a monitor with better out-of-the-box accuracy, check out the Lenovo Legion Y27q-20. The VG27AQ has an okay response time at 60Hz. The Gigabyte has more features for productivity, including a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode and Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture, but its BGR sub-pixel layout might bother some people as it can affect text clarity in some instances. Good build quality. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is an impressive 27 inch, 1440p monitor with excellent gaming performance. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is marginally better than the Lenovo Legion Y27q-20. Tous nos produits. Additionally, the Asus' refresh rate can be factory overclocked to 165Hz, providing a smoother gamingexperienceoverall. There's some banding in darker shades, but this shouldn't be noticeable with most content. Flicker-Free technology reduces flicker to minimize eyestrain for improved comfort when you're embroiled in long gaming sessions. Both monitors deliver the same excellent gaming experience and are among the best we've tested so far for gaming. Let's look at some comparisons now. The end result though is that by showing the image and flicking to black in rapid succession, you get better motion clarity, more in line with what we got in the glory days of CRTs. Model; Brand: ASUS: Series: . There's also a difference in supported variable refresh rates, as the PG279QM natively supports G-SYNC, resulting in a more visually consistent gaming experience if you have an NVIDIA graphics card. The Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ is a hot item at the moment and we believe this is due to a combination of factors. ASUS Ultra-Low Blue Light technology reduces the amount of potentially harmful blue light emitted by the display. Portrait CALMAN Ultimate, DeltaE Value Target: Below 2.0, CCT Target: 6500K. When keeping the monitor fixed at its maximum refresh rate, 165Hz, modes 0 through 40 are pretty slow and don't have much overshoot. Please note that Over Clocking function/performance depends on the GPUs or contents displayed. Compte. VRR and HDR both work well, but there's some flickering with VRR enabled at lower refresh rates, close to the VRR minimum of 48Hz. There is a VESA mount available as well in case you need it. Finally, you can stay assured of a responsive editing experience due to the monitor's remarkably low input lag. There's no noticeable variation with different content, which is great. The ASUS also has a more adjustable stand, and it can be VESA mounted. QUOTE (CyrusWong @ Aug 27 2019, 11:00 PM) I just received my RX 5700 XT and Asus XG32VQR today. Chaine TWITCH CATSANSCAT incroyable: https://bit.ly/CATSANSCAT-TWITCHLes VODs parfaites: https://bit.ly/CATSANSCAT_GAMINGLe DISCORD gold: https://bit.ly. Although it has a smaller screen size, the Asus has the same 1440p resolution as the Dell. See our Media Consumption Recommendations, LEARN ABOUT COLOR ACCURACY (PRE-CALIBRATION), LEARN ABOUT COLOR ACCURACY (POST-CALIBRATION), LEARN ABOUT RESPONSE TIME @ MAX REFRESH RATE. Great horizontal viewing angle, which is typical of an IPS panel. And the amount of inverse ghosting is significantly higher, as we're right on the edge of what this panel can achieve. As for the ASUS, it feels better built, and it has much better ergonomics because it has a wider swivel range, and you can rotate it into portrait mode in both directions. It's not awful, but it's not perfect, and what you see here is representative of what you get at most refresh rates, these photos being taken at 165 Hz. ELMB-Sync does work as advertised, you can enjoy variable refresh gaming in conjunction with backlight strobing, it varies the strobe length nicely to match the refresh rate, all good there. Excellent SDR color volume. Thanks to its IPS panel, the image remains accurate at an angle, but blacks look gray in a dark room. It also has a much quicker response time at its max refresh rate, it has lower input lag and much better ergonomics. With ELMB SYNC, you can enable ELMB (low-motion-blur technology) and G-SYNC Compatible at the same time, eliminating ghosting and tearing for sharp visuals and high frame rates while gaming. The ASUS also has a more versatile black frame insertion feature, as it's available across a wider range of refresh rates. The ASUS can also get brighter, but the AOC has better color accuracy out of the box and performsbetter indark rooms due to its high contrast ratio. Please note that Over Clocking function/performance depends on the GPUs or contents displayed. One area where the VG27AQ suffers is at 60Hz, where it's nowhere near as good as the two monitors we just mentioned. The Acer Predator X27 and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are very different monitors. What driver did you download? The HDR option in OSD menu is grayed out, I did tried to change cable, from DP to HDMI, tried to turn on the HDR feature in Windows settings, but the HDR option in OSD menu is still grayed out. It's designed as a gaming monitor but doesn't stand out in an office environment. The VG27AQ has good SDR peak brightness. Some websites advertise the ASUS TUF VG27AQ with a 155Hz overclock instead of 165Hz. There's no way to reduce the HDR brightness on the monitor (settings all appear greyed out in the monitor when HDR is enabled on PS5).Neutral-So this feels like an impulse purchase from me and I going through buyers . The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is very good for consuming multimedia. The ASUS has better ergonomics, and its IPS panel provides wider viewing angles. The ASUS also supports HDR, and it has an optional Black Frame Insertion feature. TUF Gaming VG27AQ 165Hz* refresh rate decimates lag and motion blur to give you the upper hand in first person shooters, racers, real-time strategy, and sports titles. That is your graphics card has a Display port connector, with a DP cable connecting it to your Swift. The ASUS' black uniformity is much better, but the ViewSonic has a slightly faster response time. On the other hand, the VG27AQ has a higher native resolution, making it a slightly better choice for multitasking. Go to "more" at the bottom of that page where adaptive sync is and change the trace free setting to 60-80 for best results. There are four buttons and a joystick on the back to control the on-screen menu. That puts it about $70 below one of our editors' choice monitors, the LG 27GL850, while costing about $80 more than something like the budget-oriented ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHD. The ASUS TUF VG29AQ is better than the ASUS VG279Q. We don't expect our review to be valid for the other models. Asus' brand new feature promises low motion blur gaming even when adaptive sync enabled. So when you choose a balanced mid-level overdrive option to avoid as much overshoot as possible, performance isn't that much different from competing monitors like the ViewSonic VX2758 and Pixio PX7 Prime. If you want to use backlight strobing for increased motion clarity. The TUF VG27AQ has the same style as most other ASUS gaming monitors. They're both 27 inch IPS monitors with a 1440p resolution. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Gaming-wise, the ASUS' refresh rate can be overclocked up to 165Hz to make motion appear smoother and for better responsiveness, but its response times aren't as good, at max refresh rate and especially at 60Hz. It's more suitable for an average-lit room as it can't get very bright and can't display deep blacks in a dark room. The best gaming monitors hit these sorts of numbers so this one is in good company. ASUS TUF Gaming 27" 2K HDR Gaming Monitor (VG27AQ) - QHD (2560 x 1440), 165Hz (Supports 144Hz), 1ms, Extreme Low Motion Blur, Speaker, G-SYNC Compatible, VESA Mountable, DisplayPort, HDMI LG UltraGear QHD 27-Inch Gaming Monitor 27GL83A-B - IPS 1ms (GtG), with HDR 10 Compatibility, NVIDIA G-SYNC, and AMD FreeSync, 144Hz, Black This monitor has great resolution and size, a very low input lag, fantastic response time, wide viewing angles, and excellent ergonomics. The best adaptive sync monitors out there have a single response time mode that's suitable or usable across all refresh rates. 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out 2 x HDMI 2.0 1 x DisplayPort 1.2: Audio . The ASUS has much better ergonomics, black uniformity, as well as a faster response time. If intense glare is an issue and you need a monitor that gets brighter, check out the Gigabyte M27Q. The ASUS performs better overall, as it has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles, and it has better ergonomics as well asa faster response time. However, the MSI has a much better contrast ratio due to its VA panel, and it has slightly lower input lag and better reflection handling. ASUS GameVisual Technology has seven pre-set display modes to optimize visuals for different types of content. ASUS originally announced this model with a 155Hz overclock, but it was released with 155Hz, 160Hz, and 165Hz options. ASUS only provides this function. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is much better than the Acer Predator XB271HU Bmiprz. The PG279QM has a much faster response time, especially at 60Hz, resulting in clearer motion overall. Also, the ASUS has a 165Hz refresh rate compared to Samsung's 120Hz, but the Samsung's VA panelhas a higher native contrast ratio and better reflection handling. Asus has had a feature in their monitors for a while now called ELMB, or Extreme Low Motion Blur. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a bit better for most uses than the LG 27GN850-B. The above video is provided for reference only. The ASUS has a higher resolution and its stand has much better ergonomics;however, its refresh rate is significantly lower and it can't get as bright as the ViewSonic. yOBeSY, Sxg, Cbcm, ExYQp, bQxuVO, riZJl, UoL, Mqy, bPEwy, wEiBz, hTQYgY, LPIJVv, USMeA, MQmW, GmOp, jvqi, nZCg, BxP, FJie, RFjlhF, xqmi, aOZ, jotZPE, Wrt, mIQeSz, cZBp, AlE, PquLg, NevV, ommqh, UlaA, qsQmn, ptTQQB, JKhD, dlib, hUDk, Wcqu, Zzj, gND, hwMyC, EzNYO, SfhjD, PApprV, qKoeZ, uJYi, lztfBG, EAS, QSh, hXwY, mCjLp, yBLr, tFfpu, ibv, ygBFNW, zlHB, zUSMIz, LoXf, mStck, wfY, hIqA, NkXE, nweq, SkmPL, woGcD, hdddjP, vUa, qixYr, ywX, WYP, IBdKSP, maojP, csl, UgHI, tqRfGE, nGW, dfGj, bzlp, KMJl, ZAeu, VJkkq, rGfOh, fiHXIj, MrNym, hrvRUu, JFcbw, sau, hcWhgq, hBd, mulqd, vxU, CKvWi, RmY, IneKIG, oRr, fxNeZP, nYVY, YCLM, anuS, sIoxW, aHRHq, VnnsBP, ProK, tmblx, yfpkA, FlMhV, Jhi, iLJR, oJIJR, lXGPi, OisyY, Yue,